Taiwan Wild Bird Federation Bird Records Database

說明

資料紀錄

此資源sampling event的資料已發佈為達爾文核心集檔案（DwC-A），其以一或多組資料表構成分享生物多樣性資料的標準格式。 核心資料表包含 102,716 筆紀錄。

亦存在 1 筆延伸集的資料表。延伸集中的紀錄補充核心集中紀錄的額外資訊。 每個延伸集資料表中資料筆數顯示如下。

此 IPT 存放資料以提供資料儲存庫服務。資料與資源的詮釋資料可由「下載」單元下載。「版本」表格列出此資源的其它公開版本，以便利追蹤其隨時間的變更。

版本

以下的表格只顯示可公開存取資源的已發布版本。

如何引用

研究者應依照以下指示引用此資源。:

Taiwan Wild Bird Federation, Lin MM, Chen WJ, Lin DL, Ko CJ, Lin RS, Ding TS (2018): Taiwan Wild Bird Federation Bird Records Database. v1.6. Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute. Dataset/Samplingevent. http://ipt.taibif.tw/resource?r=cwbfbrd&v=1.6

權利

研究者應尊重以下權利聲明。:

此資料的發布者及權利單位為 Taiwan Biodiversity Research Institute。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.

GBIF 註冊

此資源已向GBIF註冊，並指定以下之GBIF UUID: 78fc169f-cef0-4054-88ec-9b694bcbf6e4。  Taiwan Biodiversity Research Institute 發佈此資源，並經由Taiwan Biodiversity Information Facility同意向GBIF註冊成為資料發佈者。

關鍵字

Aves; bird observations; birdwatchers; citizen science; long-term population trends; Samplingevent; Samplingevent

聯絡資訊

地理涵蓋範圍

TWBF Database is a nationwide database which covered the island of Taiwan, its offshore islands, and surrounding seas.

分類群涵蓋範圍

A total of 586 species and 2 subspecies, as well as 16 species combinations and 3 domestic types, were recorded, covering about 90% of the bird species have been recorded in Taiwan. The classification system followed the 2018 edition of the eBird/Clements taxonomy (Clements et al. 2018).

時間涵蓋範圍

計畫資料

Integrating the historical bird records of TWBF Database, and converting the records to eBird database format and Darwin Core.

參與計畫的人員:

取樣方法

Each provided birdwatching checklist represents one sampling event. From July 8th, 1972 to April 9th, 2017, a total of 102,716 sampling events were conducted. The main sampling methods include transects, point counts, and area searches.

方法步驟描述:

1. During the surveys, birdwatchers detected and identified bird species with naked eyes, through binoculars and telescopes, or by listening to the bird sounds, and filled out the checklists with species, number of individuals, location, date, start time, duration, sampling protocol, and survey effort.
2. Birdwatchers submitted their checklists to TWBF Database via a web form that validated the content and format of the entered records. To ensure the quality of data, each checklist was requested to at least provide the information of survey location, date, time, and the completeness of species lists (users could choose to submit a complete checklist, including all the species detected, or an incomplete checklist with only certain species they concerned).
3. We obtained the raw data from TWBF database and standardized it according to the Darwin Core format. The original contents were kept as much as possible during the data conversion unless there was an obvious mistake. Most of the checklists lack precise coordinates information because the TWBF database had requested only textual descriptions of survey location for a long time. Therefore, we inferred and restored the approximate area where each event took place according to the description, then located the latitude and longitude at a vicinal bird-watching hotspot, the location with suitable habitat, or the geographical center of the area. The uncertainty of coordinate inference was within 1000 meters. For those checklists stating further details about the sampling methods, we looked into the descriptions, defined the practices as transects, point counts, or area searches, and quantified the corresponding sampling efforts with transect length, time duration, or area covered.

引用文獻

1. eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relMay-2017. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. May 2017.Fang, W.-H. 2015. Commemorate the pioneer of bird occurrence database, Mr. Guo-Dong Lin. Yuhina Post 256:19-20. (in Chinese)

額外的詮釋資料